Product Overview

A quick look at the GLYNT.AI solution

Audit-Ready Sustainability Data

Prepared for ISSA 5000 and other audit standards

Sustainability Data Layer

Works with the software and AI you already use

Approval Workflows for Sustainability Data

Four-Eyes review for audit compliance

Finance-Grade Sustainability Data

The same rigor as financial data

Integrate with Financial Data

Reconcile against your financial ledger

AI-Ready Sustainability Data

See what’s missing or flagged before deadlines

Powered by Green AI

Built for low energy use and emissions

Best Practices for Sustainability Data Management

Manage data instead of wrangling it

Enterprise Security

Privacy, security, and controls

Sustainability Data Accuracy

We test your data so you don’t have to

Comprehensive File Capture

Extract data from scans, portals, and messy formats

Customized Reporting

See what’s missing or flagged before deadlines

Audits & Assurance

Traceable data, approval workflows with SOC compliance

Business Value Add

Customize output files for CSRD, IFSR, CBAM, UKSRS

Energy Data Management

Granular data for transparency and cost reductions

Waste Data Management

Pull files from everywhere, send data to anywhere

Scope 3 & PCFs

Stop chasing suppliers, move to finance-grade quality

Blog

What’s new with GLYNT

Customer Stories

Industry applications for GLYNT solutions

Guides

GLYNT’s expertise and thought leadership

How ESG Scores Impact Corporate Value

by | May 25, 2022

The pace of ESG investing and disclosures have left us all breathless. And sometimes, at the family dinner table or the weekend barbeque we can’t even answer the basic question: Do ESG scores really matter? Do they impact company value? 

The graphic below is a quick primer. And any chart that has five moving parts is always a bit hard to remember, so no worries if you failed the weekend barbeque quiz!

From ESG Scorecards to Financial Impacts

A flowchart. The top of the chart reads “climate change scenarios” and flows down into “macroeconomic model,” which flows down into “corporate impact of climate change: cost of loans, access to credit, company valuation.” Corporate income flows to the left, into “corporate financial data,” which flows left into “corporate climate risk scorecards.” “Scorecards” and “corporate financial data” both flow upwards into “corporate climate risk sensitivity,” which flows right and back into “macroeconomic model.”

The story has two starting points. On the left is the company’s ESG Scorecard. We’ll look at just the emissions component. This data file is the baseline emissions recorded at every site, the emissions reduction plan set by management, it’s impact on operating and capital expenses, and the company’s exposure to physical climate risk at every location, such as floods, wildfires and heat. The second starting point is at the top, the Climate Scenarios.

The investor-side financial analyst combines the data on the company’s emissions position with the climate scenarios. The scenarios are long, through 2050, and contain detailed data on physical climate risks around the globe as well as a broad macroeconomic model that has been expanded to include the costs of climate change. 

Consider three alternate futures: 

    • Everyone cooperates and reduces emissions. This scenario has less physical damage from climate change to the company of interest, but the company must make emissions reduction investments which reduce profitability. 
    • No one really reduces emissions. This scenario has high costs of physical damage for every company. Profitability declines. 
    • Some companies reduce emissions but not most. In this scenario there are high costs from physical damage and high costs for those who reduce emissions. 

The investor-side analyst runs each scenario and models out the company’s potential losses. This impacts valuation, revenues and expenses. The analyst also rates the company against its peers.

A corporate financial analyst, e.g. inside the company, uses this framework to optimize the amount of climate exposure, not under-investing and not overpaying for emissions reductions. 

For both analysts, there is a direct feedback loop between today’s level of emissions and the company’s valuation. Today, about one-third of investor-side financial analysts are thinking along the lines of the graph above. The connection between ESG Scorecards and valuation can’t be ignored.